*****  To join INSNA, visit  *****


I have been chewing on the idea that in a given intra-organizational 
network the process of knowledge creation is going to be enabled or 
constrained by the number of distinct, non-overlapping sub groups.  Also, 
that rather than totally unconnected fragments, what is key is that these 
groups are connected by to each other.

One way to capture this idea, I thought, would be to look at the number of 
non-overlapping subgroups of strong relations in an advice-seeking 
relationship.  But what is the mechanism of linking?  Options include 
brokers in a different network of strong relationships, brokers in a 
different network of weak relationships, or brokers in the same network, 
but using weak relationships. So, if you are a subgroup with a broker, you 
are more connected (and more likely to spread your knowledge) than one 
without.  A related question than becomes who "counts" as a broker?  Is 
there some good cut-off value?  Or maybe use the five individuals with the 
highest brokerage score?

So, three questions (and thank you paid forward)-
1) Is this similar to some work out there already?
2) Does the clustering coefficient already capture what I am describing as 
connected subgroups?
3) Does one of the options above sound better to you? (Advice subgroups 
with brokers in communication, Advice subgroups with brokers in weak 
communication, or advice subgroups with brokers in weak advice relations)?

Thanks to all-

Jordi Comas
Visiting Assistant Professor
Bucknell University
570 577-3161
[log in to unmask]

"There is nothing so practical as a good theory."  Kurt Lewin 

SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers ( To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.