Print

Print


Dropping a Bomb on Accreditation


In its first six months of operation, the Education Department's higher
education commission has been best known - and most feared in academe - for
some off-handed comments from the panel's chairman about the need for more
evidence that college students are actually learning something. Many
academic leaders took that to mean that the panel planned a national
<http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/02/15/testing>  standardized test
for higher education - an idea that the chairman, Charles Miller, has
repeatedly insisted is a misinterpretation.

Now the Secretary of Education's Commission on the Future of Higher
Education has a new target: higher education's longstanding, little
understood, and much-maligned system of regional accreditation. And an
<http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/dickeson.pdf>
"issue paper" Miller released Thursday leaves little room for
misinterpretation about the perceived problems or the proposed solution: a
"national accreditation foundation" that Congress would create to replace
the current system.

Article link with current comments following article;

http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/03/31/accredit

One other blurb from article: 

While Miller himself did not write the often scathing report - "The Need for
Accreditation Reform" was prepared by Robert C. Dickeson, a former vice
president at the Lumina Foundation and a consultant to the commission - its
release at his "request" signals a continued desire on the chairman's part
to challenge college leaders to rethink how they operate.

That inclination is reflected in several other papers that the commission
released Thursday,
<http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports.html>  too. One in
particular, titled
<http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/miller-malandra.pdf
> "Accountability/Assessment," is a sharply worded laundry list of many
problems that Miller and his co-author, Geri H. Malandra, associate vice
chancellor for institutional planning at the University of Texas System, say
afflict American higher education: a "dangerous complacency about the real
quality and impact" of the system, student outcomes that are of "grave
concern," elitism and a growing chasm between college access for low- and
higher income students, and a "gaping information void" about colleges'
performance, to name just a few.

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]