Note on the Florida Farm-to-Fuel Program
Initiative enacted by Commissioner Charles H. Bronson in January 
In part, the intention of the program is to promote fuel and 
non-food crop production, to create mutual benefits for farmers 
and fuel industries and other industries, and governments. And, in 
part, the intention of the program is to seek alternative, 
diversified, and sustainable means of meeting our state and 
national fuel needs.
In order to enhance a measure of sustainability for long-term 
viability of crop and soil productivity, certain quality standards 
and/or regulations need to be implemented.

Below are links to fuel crop programs at the state level, the 
national level, and in the UK.

1. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services? Farm 
to Fuel Program:

Marshall Wiseheart ([log in to unmask])
Les Harrison([log in to unmask])
Telephone: (850) 488-9948

National Websites

2. U.S. Dept. of Energy Biofuels Site:

3. U.S. Dept. of Energy Biomass Program Site:

4. Biomass Publications:

5. National Campaign For Sustainable Agriculture
110 Maryland Avenue, Suite 306
Washington, DC 20002
Phone: 202-544-5466

6. Message from the European Biodiesel Board:
?The EU currently uses two main tools for supporting the growing 
of raw materials for non-food and energy production. One is the 
set ? aside scheme that you mention and the other one is the 
energy crop scheme that applies only to area non set-aside. Both 
regimes are submitted to very strict environmental compliance 
schemes under the so called cross-compliance of the CAP*.?

Raffaello Garofalo
Secretary General
EBB - European Biodiesel Board
E-mail [log in to unmask]
Web site:

*Cross-compliance of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
(See attached pdf. doc.: CAP.pdf.for a review of EU regulations)

CAP Reform

See also, Energy Crop Aid Scheme & Renewable Power / Energy 
(See link to Biofuels/Alternative uses for Crops.pdf)


On Mon Aug 07 12:01:56 EDT 2006, Steve Humphrey <[log in to unmask]> 

> BESTers, thought you should see this thoughtful message from a 
> colleague.
> She is recommending that UF should take a look at biofuels from 
> an
> ecosystems viewpoint in addition the the economic, agronomic, and
> engineering viewpoints already getting attention.  Dr. Stephen R. 
> Humphrey, Director of Academic Programs, School of Natural 
> Resources and Environment, Box 116455, 103 Black Hall, University 
> of Florida Gainesville, FL  32611-6455  USA Tel. 352-392-9230, 
> Fax 352-392-9748  <>   
> _____  From: Swain, Hilary [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 1:30 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
> Cc: [log in to unmask]; Bohlen, Patrick; Lollis, L. Gene
> Subject: Farm fuel summit
>  <>
> Strongly 
> suggest you put this on your radar screen. While I am an 
> enthusiastic proponent of biofuels (although not corn since it
> seems so inefficient), and I am really  interested in finding 
> ranchers and
> foresters economically (and ecologically) sustainable ways  of 
> staying  on
> their land,  there are some potential pitfalls here. This would 
> be a great opportunity to make sure that one could be
> enthusiastic about Florida biofuels as long as 1. They are not 
> planning on species that could be invasive (some have been
> planning just this e.g. Arundo donax).  This should be a very 
> important
> principle in Florida . Now is the time to get this concern 
> embedded in the
> mindset. 2.  It  does not precipitate intensification of huge 
> acreages of rangeland
> and unimproved or semi-native pasture to crop production - huge 
> loss for
> Florida's native biodiversity.  I doubt  if this is going to be 
> considered
> for abandoned citrus areas on sandy soils although may be a use 
> for
> abandoned Flatwoods citrus off ridges. 3. It doesn't require 
> higher nutrient inputs to maintain productivity that
> would exacerbate existing huge nutrient challenges.
> 4. We need to think carefully about any implications for fire 
> management and
> harvesting versus reduced use of  fire for ecosystem maintenance. 
> 5. I haven't really thought through the implications for 
> ecosystem benefits
> of existing silvicultural operations but assume Janaki has been 
> giving this
> some thought. Hilary Swain, Ph.D. Executive Director Archbold 
> Biological Station PO Box 2057 Lake Placid, FL 33862 telephone: 
> 863-465-2571 fax: 863-699-1927 email: [log in to unmask] 
> web site:  <file://> 
> My assistant is Cheryl Henderson - 
> [log in to unmask]

Kiara S. Winans
Graduate Student
Env. Engineering Department
University of Florida
(352)335-3959 (c)