***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org ***** John-- Determining which, if any, distribution is the best description of the data is a question that is best answered by doing some sort of model comparison. Broadly speaking, there are two types of model comparison: frequentist goodness-of-fit tests and Bayesian model selection. A very common example of a frequentist goodness-of-fit test is the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (see Numerical Recipes or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov-Smirnov). The output of such a test is a p-value which is usually used to either reject or not reject a particular model at a certain significance level. For example, you might be interested in determining whether the degree distribution for the power-grid is well described by a power-law distribution, in which case you might find that the p-value given by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is p=0.0000000001 (obviously making this up) and you would reject the power-law distribution as a candidate model for the degree distribution of the power-grid. An important caveat for doing goodness-of-fit tests is that it assumes that you already know the parameters from some other source. If you use the data, in any way, to infer the model parameters, you must use Monte Carlo hypothesis testing to compute a p-value (e.g. http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1062). Another approach is to use Bayesian model selection. The advantage of Bayesian hypothesis testing is that you can say things like "model A is 10000 times more likely than model B". For example, you might be interested in determining whether a power-law distribution or an exponential distribution is a better description of the power-grid degree distribution, in which case you might say that the exponential distribution is 1000 times more likely than the power-law distribution (obviously making this up). A great resource for Bayesian data analysis techniques is the Daniel Sivia's primer "Data Analysis: a Bayesian tutorial". I hope that you find this helpful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. Cheers. Dean On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:36 PM, John McCreery <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > ***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org ***** > > As I prepare my presentation for Sunbelt, I am checking the networks my data > reveal for the kinds of properties that I read about in sources that include > Newman, Barabási, and Watts (2006), The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. > > 1. Giant components? Check > 2. Giant bicomponents that approach the size of the giant components? > Check? > 3. Right-skewed degree distributions? Check > > But then I read, in the introduction to Chapter 3, a discussion of Amaral, > et. al. (2000), a paper that examines five networks and discovers that none > have power-law degree distributions. > > Instead, all of them are right-skewed but with non-power-law distributions: >> the power grid and air traffic networks have exponential distributions, the >> high school and Mormon networks have Gaussian distributions, and the movie >> actor network has an exponentially truncated power-law distribution. > > > Here my mathematical ignorance blocks further understanding. I want to know > how to do the calculations to determine which kind of distributions best fit > my data. My rapid survey of Wikipedia articles on power laws, O > descriptions, that sort of thing, leaves me with the impression that this is > a black art; but, I suspect, I am missing something. > > Can anyone here direct me to a curve-fitting for dummies primer that will > shed some light on my problem or some smart person who already knows how to > do this sort of thing? > > Your help will be greatly appreciated. > > John McCreery > The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN > Tel. +81-45-314-9324 > [log in to unmask] > http://www.wordworks.jp/ > > _____________________________________________________________________ > SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social > network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send > an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line > UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message. > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- R. Dean Malmgren Ph.D. Candidate Chemical & Biological Engineering Department Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Road, Room E136 Evanston, IL 60208 E-mail: [log in to unmask] Phone: +1 847 491 7231 Fax: +1 847 491 7070 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- _____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.