Print

Print


You mention that RM "does not encompass non-records."  Does you program's 
mission or charge include the management of non-records?  If yes, I would 
look to expand the scope of the name.  If not, using only RM helps to limit 
the scope of your responsibilities and obligations.

Just another consideration since that was left open by your original 
message.

Tod Chernikoff, CRM
[log in to unmask]

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Schremp, Kaitlyn R" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 11:09
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [RM] Records Management Program

I am currently in the process of developing a "name" for our records 
management program.  I am wondering what most companies are using to name 
their records management program. We are currently hesitant to use Records 
Management, because the name doesn't encompass non-records.

Some names we are currently going between are:

Records Management
Records and information Management
Information Management
Information Lifecycle Management

Kaitlyn Schremp
Records Manager
Xcel Energy
612.330.5637 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]