*****  To join INSNA, visit  *****

<<<-------- Zachary P Neal-------->>>
> *****  To join INSNA, visit  *****
> Barry,
> I certainly agree that it typically makes sense to log distances.
> But, I'm curious about your rationale for using log10 rather than loge
> (natural log), which seems more common.  I don't think I've ever seen
> a comparison or an argument about which transformation is more
> appropriate when predicting interaction as a function of distance, but
> perhaps this work is out there.

  It should be irrelevant since the values are linearly related

    log10 x  =  log10 e  *  ln x


Vladimir Batagelj, University of Ljubljana, FMF, Department of Mathematics
  Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers ( To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.