***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****


I think Filip’s suggestions are quite helpful and at the same time Jorge’s frustrations understandable.  The problem is some people will be quite concerned about network dependencies and the challenges with specifying network effects whereas others will be content to focus on behaviors and policy interpretations of these types of influences.  (Somewhat like the balance between Type I and Type II error.)  And the researcher wishes to “do the right thing.”  We/I have opted to do both, node level regressions using somewhat standard multi-level (or hierarchical) regression techniques and, when possible, build models using STATNET and SIENA.  So far the results are fairly consistent with different approaches yielding different but not contradictory insights.  An example is our paper on the adoption/diffusion of the FCTC:

Wipfli, H., Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. W. (2010).  Global tobacco control diffusion: The case of the framework convention on tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1260-1266.

So there is no right answer and no single approach that covers all situations.  The researcher will need to pursue at least 2 and sometimes multiple modeling approaches to be confident the findings are consistent across multiple specifications.



Thomas W. Valente, PhD

Current:  École des hautes études en santé publique (Rennes/Paris, France)


Director, Master of Public Health Program      http://www.usc.edu/medicine/mph/

Professor, Department of Preventive Medicine

Keck School of Medicine

University of Southern California

1000 S. Fremont Ave., #8

Building A Room 5133                     

Alhambra CA 91803              

phone: (626) 457-4139; cell: (626) 429-4123

email: [log in to unmask]


Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications:

       http://www.oup.com/us (promo code: 28569)

Evaluating Health Promotion Programs: www.oup-usa.org/

Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations: www.hamptonpress.com

My personal webpage: http://www-hsc.usc.edu/~tvalente/

The Empirical Networks Project: http://ipr1.hsc.usc.edu/networks/

You Tube video on Diffusion of Innovations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG9dAIBd4xQ


From: Social Networks Discussion Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of F.Agneessens
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 7:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ergm question


***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org ***** Dear Jorge,

If you are interested in explaining individual outcome, why not use a regression model with these opinions as dependent variables and network structure as independent?
This has been done quite extensively: e.g.,
- Brass, D.J. 1984. Being in the right place. A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 518-539.
- Sparrowe, R.T, Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Kraimer, M.L. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal: 316-325.

If you do not want to rely on the significance test of the 'normal' regression (which traditionally relies on a random sampling from a population), you could even make use of a QAP-like node level regression. For example in UCINET you can do this with the following command: Tools>Testing hypotheses>Node Level>Regression.

However, if you think a person's opinion is influenced by the opinions of his connections you can use an 'autocorrelation'-type of regression. In that case, see for example:
-Doreian, P. 1981. Estimating linear models with spatially distributed data. Sociological Methodology 12:359-388.
-Doreian, P., K. Teuter, C. Wang. 1984. Network autocorrelation models: Some Monte Carlo results. Sociological Methods & Research 13: 155-200.
-Marsden, P.V., Friedkin, N.E. 1993. Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research 22, 127-151.
-Leenders, R.Th.A.J. 2002. Modelling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 24: 21-47.

Hope this helps,

On 02-05-11, Jorge M Rocha <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****

Dear all,

I have a conceptual question that is probably somewhat naïve regarding the analytic logic behind ERGM’s (I’ve been using statnet and its suite of tools).  If someone in the community could point me in the right direction literature wise, I would appreciate it.  Now let me try to state my question/doubt as briefly and clearly as I can:

From what I understand, the modeling framework of an ERGM treats the observed network as the dependent variable and the specified structural configurations and covariate information about nodes/edges as independent variables whose presence/absence increases the log-likelihood for the model.  In other words, what we want to achieve in these models is to gain a better understanding of the types of processes that might have gone into generating a network similar to the observed one; hypotheses are about this or that configuration or node/edge attribute and their effect on the pattern of social interactions represented in the network. If so, how would I go about testing hypotheses concerning the effects of social interactions on nodal attributes (I’m particularly thinking of different types of opinions individuals might tend to have based on their interactions)?  

What I’ve done so far is kind of arguing backwards (or at least that is how it feels to me –maybe because I’m coming from a traditional linear/logit regression background, and probably part of my problem is thinking in terms of DV and IV).  If the coefficients are significant for some node covariate of my interest in the ERGM estimation, then I’ve been interpreting this as evidence that it is not unreasonable to argue that the pattern of social interactions influences the type of opinion individuals have (I know that if I had longitudinal data this issue of reverse causality would not be so much of an issue, but so far all I have is cross-sectional data).  How wrong am I on this (the backward-arguing)?

Finally, part of my worry is that I’ll be sending the research to a consumer behavior/marketing journal where the familiarity with social network stuff –let alone ERGM’s—is limited.  Any suggestions on how to best explain these issues to a non-specialized audience?

In advance, thanks,


Jorge M Rocha

EGADE Business School



_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.



Dr. Filip Agneessens

Department of Sociology/ICS

University of Groningen

Grote Rozenstraat 31

9712 TG Groningen

The Netherlands

email: [log in to unmask]


_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.

_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.