But that report omits, for some reason, Elluminate, Wimba and Centra which are Connect’s three closest competitors.



Ron Thomas | Coordinator of Distance Education| University of Florida/ College of Agricultural and Life Sciences

Distance Education Section G016 McCarty D | P.O. Box 110145, Gainesville,  FL 32611  ( 352-392-3895* [log in to unmask]




From: Synchronous Learning Collaboration Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Justin DeLeo
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: It's Mid-October!


Hi Ben and All,


Thanks for the follow-up. WebEx was the follow-up contender to Adobe Connect according to this report (attached and linked) that I stumbled upon while playing with my iPad over the w/e. (The report is on the Adobe website, of course.)






Justin De Leo, M.Ed.

Instructional Design & Research

University of Florida

College of Pharmacy

Information & Instructional Technology

(352) 273-6523

[log in to unmask]


From: Synchronous Learning Collaboration Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Campbell,Benjamin Allen
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: It's Mid-October!


I think the committee is now looking at Webex as well. There is a vendor presentation at 11AM next Tuesday. I suspect that means no decision will be reached by October, but cannot verify. 


We are having fun continuing to look at BBB. We will likely be deploying it for an external contract, giving us ample time to review and develop it over the next few months. I still think the ideal scenario for any system would be giving every user (yes, EVERY faculty/staff AND student) a meeting room, along with every course also having a meeting room. This would greatly reduce the administrative overhead associated with creating rooms, assigning users, granting permissions, etc. 


The Adobe Connect rep brought up this scenario as a joke, and I said I thought it was the perfect solution. But he laughed and said we couldn't afford it. 


BBB is easy, and if we can figure out the few remaining bugs that impact usability in the version 0.8 release, we will likely move to it in the COE. If one of the proprietary vendors is selected, it seems logical the licensing will be charged to individual programs, as has been the case with Elluminate. In that case, we only need to host and support the system internally, and can replace the cost of licensing with the cost of human development and support time. Naturally, this would be easier in an economy of scale that involved the larger university committee.  


We'll see, I suppose ;-)


Ben Campbell, M.A.E.
Assistant Director, Office of Distance Learning
UF College of Education

Please send all requests for technical assistance to [log in to unmask]


On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:44 AM, White,Susan O wrote:


It is still under review.


From: Synchronous Learning Collaboration Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James Kocher
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: It's Mid-October!


So any word on what product is being recommended by the search committee?






James S. Kocher, BA

Educational Media Coordinator

College of Pharmacy

University of Florida

PO Box 100484

Gainesville, FL 32610

Office: 352-273-6595

Mobile: 352-246-2244