Logically no, but then there is the old caveat emptor admonishment. at what
point do the clients take on responsibility. sounds like the firm has been
in some trouble for quite sometime.
at the same time we don't know what stocks were held by the customers and
as the graph pointed out the market goes up and down.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> The link here was to a story that indicated between when the penalty was
> enacted, the market dropped in value.  Does it make sense that the clients
> have to shoulder the losses because their stocks were locked up?

Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]