***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
Charles-
I understand brokers to be entities that already exist in the network (i.e, B controls the ability of C to communicate to A). Do the references you provided (thank you for them, by the way) discuss (for lack of a better term) "potential" brokers, as in "adding someone to the network between G and J would be better than adding someone between M and C"?
Thanks.
Michael
On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Charles Kadushin wrote:
The concept of "broker" is what you are looking for. See the index in my new book "Understanding Social Networks" for findings and literature on brokers.
Classically, the first extended discussion of brokers is in Boissevain, Jeremy. 1974. Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators and coalitions. London: Basil Blackwell. No metrics, but lots of good ideas.
On 1/13/2012 1:31 PM, Michael Vitevitch wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
Dear SocNet-ers:
I'm somewhat familiar with the work and measures developed by Burt on structural holes, and the work of Borgatti on "keyplayers." What I have not been able to find are references/software relevant to a related idea (perhaps because I'm not looking in the right area or with the right terms). Here is the similar, yet different issue I'm interested in:
Imagine a network of faculty at a university, with edges connecting faculty with similar research interests. Instead of adding a link between two nodes, say A and B, that already exist (what I understand as the structural holes issue), I'm interested in being able to identify portions of the network that would be "strengthened" by or otherwise benefit from the addition of a *new* node that connects to two existing nodes in the network. This might be equivalent to hiring a new faculty member (X) to build collaborative relations between two existing nodes (A and B) rather than directly connecting A and B. I'm interesting in some sort of metric/measure to indicate that hiring X to "connect" A and B would yield more "benefits" (e.g., more resilient network, average path length decreases, etc.) than hiring Y who would "connect" A and F, for example.
Pointers to literature on this issue and software that can identify such regions of a network would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for any assistance anyone can offer.
Mike Vitevitch
______________________________
Michael S. Vitevitch, Ph.D. Associate Professor
Department of Psychology 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045
Spoken Language Laboratory Fraser Hall Room 011 785-864-9484
Senior Associate Director University Honors Program Nunemaker Center Room 105 785-864-4225
______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.
Spoken Language Laboratory Fraser Hall Room 011 785-864-9484
Senior Associate Director University Honors Program Nunemaker Center Room 105 785-864-4225
______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.