***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org ***** Hi Lindsay, The most recent version of BPNet is capable of modelling biparite networks with dyadic attribute covariates. It is available from http://www.sna.unimelb.edu.au/pnet/pnet.html Hope this may solve your problme. All my best wishes, Peng ________________________________ From: Social Networks Discussion Forum [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Lindsay Young [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 10:46 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Analyzing effects of 2-mode relational attributes in an ERGM analysis ***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org ***** Hi all, I have a dataset of inter-organizational collaborations. However, because I was unable to collect data for the entire organizational sample what I essentially have is a 2-mode network of 22 designator organizations (i.e., organizations who took the survey) and 107 potential collaborator organizations from which they could choose. My primary research question is basically, "What are the generative mechanisms, both endogenous and exogenous, that predict being designated as a collaborator?" My intent is to use BPNet for the analysis, but I'm open to other options should responses to my question below warrant it. My question to the group is: Is there a way to include relational attributes between actors in Group A (those who designated collaborators) and organizations in Group B (those named as collaborators)? Obviously in 1-mode p*/ERGM analysis you can include dyadic relational atributes. But as fas as I can tell, the same option doesn't seem to exist for 2-mode analysis, at least not in BPNet (unless I'm missing something obvious). Examples of some of the relational variables I would like to include in the model are: (1) communication frequency between both parties; (2) a measure of patron similarity (i.e., the designator org. serves similar patrons as the collaborator it named); and (3) designators' perceptions of a specific collaborator's expertise. It seems like the combined attribute parameter option in BPNet might allow me to model effects of things like issue homophily or heterophily as a predictor in the model (e.g., when a designator and a collaborator focus on the same issue). But I'm not sure whether or how I can include other types of edge attributes, like frequency of interaction. I realize that part of the problem may simply be my less than ideal dataset and the slightly unconventional way of reconfiguring these relationships as "affiliations". However, I am eager to hear of suggestions or work-around options so that I can analyze what I do have in a probabilistic manner. Thanks in advance, Lindsay -- Lindsay Young Doctoral Student Northwestern University Communication Studies Media, Technology & Society Program _____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message. _____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.