***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
Hello Group members,

Which network parameters (apart from density, degree, and clustering coefficient) should one compare when investigating longitudinal patterns in a network (e.g., in a co-authorship network of researchers in a scientific domain captured at a fix 10 years intervals)? We are interested more to see how the co-authorship network is evolving over time e.g., is the network becoming more/less efficient and/or effective? We are interested in capturing and comparing any parameters that can shed light on the evolution of the network (e.g., using UNINET or Pajek).

One another relevant question may be what should one consider when deciding on partitioning the network data into fix intervals? Lets say we have longitudinal co-authorship data from 1970 to 2012, how should we partition this data to best capture the network evaluation?

Any suggestions are welcomed.

Thank you,


Khan, Gohar Feroz (PhD)
Assistant Professor
Korea University of Technology & Education (KoreaTECH)
1600 Chungjol-ro Byungcheon-myun
Cheonan city, 330-708, South Korea
Office: 82-41-560-1415Mobile: +82-10-5510-8071
email: [log in to unmask] 

Director Center for Social Technologies
Associate Editor Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 
I blog here


_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.