*****  To join INSNA, visit  *****

Dear Social Network Researchers,

Thanks for your informative forum. I have a question about the adequacy of
my sampling size and overall sampling strategy.

I am working on use of assisted reproduction (AR) among Caribbean immigrant
women in London (UK).

I am using respondent-driven sampling to recruit 150 immigrant women who
are undergoing AR, and a random sample of 250 other immigrant women who are
not undergoing AR  about  attitudes to assisted reproduction, and
communication in their personal networks about (assisted) reproductive

A reviewer from my college has recommended that I

(a)  limit  my sample to respondents from a few Caribbean countries, given
differing linguistic and cultural differences.

(b) consider increasing my sample size to increase the study's power.

I am aware of the cultural/linguistic differences and probably limit the
sample for the general population to a few countries.  However, I am having
difficulty justifying the need to limit the sample for women undergoing AR
to a few countries because i am not certain I would be able to have enough
cases from each country, given the fact that AR practices are not commonly
discussed in the population, and there is still a bit of stigma surrounding
it.  So, how do I justify this issue to my research review committee?

secondly, are there any resources available for calculating an adequate
sample size, if I have some idea of the population of respondents living in
London?  And do I have to calculate separate samples for the AR group of
women versus the other group of women, for each country chosen?

thanks - NoelaOy

SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers ( To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.