Print

Print


***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****

Thanks, Alex!

There are a few more Twitter diffusion/cascade articles with Duncan Watts amongst the authors…

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=twitter+cascade+duncan+watts

What I did not mention in my first post was that people added comments to my original tweet and those tweets were also re-tweeted… so there are many branches out from the original.

Valdis


On Jan 19, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Alexander Semenov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I believe it shouldn't be hard to gather and analyze such cascades with standard tools like Python. For example, "21 Receipt for Mining Twitter" which is currently a part of the second edition of "Mining the Social Web" has receipts for getting origins of retweets and users, who retweeted it:
https://github.com/ptwobrussell/Recipes-for-Mining-Twitter

I have a little different experience/research questions in this regards. Two of my mostly retweeted posts were about materials that actually anyone could see: I posted a comment on "The Majority Illusion" article from MIT Technology Review and some stuff from R-Bloggers I believe. The most weird part was that my tweet about "majority illusion" started getting second wave of retweets after weeks or maybe even a month from its publication. 

I did the literature review on SNA of Twitter data and found only a handful of relevant articles on virality, diffusion and cascades in Twitter:
  • Romero, Daniel M, Brendan Meeder, and Jon Kleinberg. 2011. “Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion across Topics.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’11, 695. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1963405.1963503. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1963405.1963503.
  • Jansen, Bernard J, and Mimi Zhang. 2009. “Twitter Power : Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2169–88. doi:10.1002/asi.
  • Gonzalez-Bailon, S., J. Borge-Holthoefer, and Y. Moreno. 2013. “Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (7): 943–65. doi:10.1177/0002764213479371. http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0002764213479371.
  • Wu, Shaomei, Jake M. Hofman, Winter a. Mason, and Duncan J. Watts. 2011. “Who Says What to Whom on Twitter.” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’11. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 705. doi:10.1145/1963405.1963504. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1963405.1963504.

So, it's still a fruitful area of research, I guess.

Best,
Alex.

вторник, 19 января 2016 г. пользователь Valdis Krebs написал:
***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****

Folks,

If anyone is studying the viral diffusion of  messages/tweets on Twitter/onine networks, they might be interested in one of my tweets.

Normally when one tweets, if there will be a viral explosion, it happens quickly and continues quickly and dies quickly.  My tweet, started slowly and keeps going slowly — but, keeps going nonetheless.  Still being actively retweeted after 3 days. Seems to be crossing country borders in the process.  Kind of like the Turtle vs. the Hare

Here is the link to the tweet(which is from my business Twitter account), not sure if there are tools to track one tweet over time?  Some type of snowball sampling?


Also, for a comparison… I tweeted almost the exact same message (added “the”) from my personal Twitter account.

It was not as viral as the one from the business account… it stopped spreading after a few days. Yet, I have 3x as many followers on my personal account than my biz account.

The link to the similar tweet is here:  https://twitter.com/ValdisKrebs/status/688229707972644864

Both tweets travelled (via RT=retweet) past my network horizon(Friedkin, 1983), something that Watts found very rare in his early studies of online diffusion networks(2012).

Timing of tweets seems to be very important… who is paying attention at the time of the tweet? And then… who is paying attention to them?

Would be interested in any research that comes of this.  

Valdis


_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.

_____________________________________________________________________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.