I'm always for the direct approach, and recently took that, also with teachers -- I did a five-column network survey where the last part was How helpful is this relationship to you, in getting your students to succeed? (Scales of 1-10 produced lots of 10s, 1-3 produced lots of 2s. I ended up using that, since the mode was also the median.)
General results, unfortunately, are pending, but I'd be happy to try to answer if you had any questions about the successfulness of the strategy.
***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****______________________________Hi everyone,
In my research we want to measure the quality of teachers' ties. We have a couple of qualitative frameworks for this, which we explored in interviews with beginning teachers, but we also want to expand these with more quantitative measures of quality (based on their ego/whole network, dyads ...).
The first thing that came into mind was 'reciprocity'. When a tie is reciprocial, the quality of the tie is higher (which is supported by literature). The literature concerning this matter, however, is scarce. That's why I was wondering what you were thinking? Which other network measures could be considered as an indicator of the quality of a tie?
______________________________ _________ SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.